Andrew Sutherland writes things but (almost) always includes pictures to look at.
Searchfox (source, config source) is Mozilla’s primary code searching tool for Firefox introduced by Bill McCloskey in 2016 which built upon prior work on DXR. This roadmap post is the second of two posts attempting to lay out where my … Continue reading →
Searchfox (source, config source) is Mozilla’s primary code searching tool for Firefox introduced by Bill McCloskey in 2016 which built upon prior work on DXR. This roadmap post is the second of two posts attempting to lay out where my personal efforts to enhance searchfox are headed and the decision making framework that guides them. The first post was a more abstract product vision document and can be found here. Discoverable, Extensible, Powerful Queries Searchfox has a new “query” endpoint introduced in bug 1762817 which is intended to enable more powerful queries. Queries are parsed using :kats‘ query-parser crate which allows us to support our existing (secret) key:value syntax in a more rigorous way (and with automatic parse correction for the inevitable typos). In order to have a sane execution model, these key/value pairs are mapped through an extensible configuration file into a pipeline / graph execution model whose clap-based commands form the basis of our testing mechanism and can also be manually built and run from the command-line via searchfox-tool. <img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="390" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-1024x390.png" alt="A graphviz diagram of the execution graph for the "foo" query. The diagram captures that the execution graph consists of 2 phases, with the first phase consisting of 3 parallel pipelines: "file-search", "semantic-search", and "text-search". Those 3 pipelines feed into "compile-results" which then passes its output to the 2nd phase which contains the "display" job. If you're interested in more details, see below for the "check output for the query" link which links the backing JSON which is the basis for the graph." class="wp-image-985" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-1024x390.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-300x114.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-600x229.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-768x293.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example-500x190.png 500w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/searchfox-query-example.png 1063w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Above you will find a diagram rendering the execution pipeline of searching for foo manually created from the JSON insta crate check output for the query. Bug 1763005 will add automatically generated diagrams as well as further expanding on the existing capability to produce markdown explanations of what is happening in each stage of the pipeline and the values at each stage. While a new query syntax isn’t exciting on its own, what is exciting is that this infrastructure makes it easier to add functionality with confidence (and tests!). Some particular details worth discussing: Customizable, Shareable Queries Bug 1799796: Do you really wish that you could issue a query like webidl:CacheStorage to search just our WebIDL files for “CacheStorage”? Does your team have terminology that’s specific to your team and it would be great to have special search terms/aliases but it would feel wrong to use up all the cool short prefixes for your team? The new query mechanism has plans for these situations! The new searchfox query endpoint looks like /mozilla-central/query/default. You’ll note that default looks like something that implies there are non-default options. And indeed, the plan is to allow files like this example “preset” dom.toml file to layer additional “terms” and “aliases” onto the base query_core.toml file as well as any other presets you want to build off of. You will need to add your preset to the mozsearch-mozilla repository for the tree in question, but the upside is that any query links you share will work for other people as well! Faceting in Search Results with Shareable URLs Bug 1799802: The basic idea of faceted search/filtering is: You start with a basic search query. Your results come back, potentially quite a lot of them. Too many, even! The faceting logic looks at the various attributes of the results and classifies or “facets” them. Does that sound too circular? We just throw things in bins. If a bin ends up having a lot of things in it and there’s some hierarchy to its contents, we recursively bin those contents. The UI presents these facets (bins), giving you a high level overview of the shape of your results, and letting you limit your results to only include certain attribute values, or to exclude based on others. The UI is able to react quickly because it already knows about the result set <img decoding="async" width="1024" height="723" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bugxhibit-cc-search-1024x723.png" alt="A barely relevant screenshot of the bugxhibit UI based on the SIMILE exhibit faceting system. The UI shows a list of bugzilla bugs grouped by date, with a column consisting of the following facets: bugzilla product, bugzilla component, bug status, bug resolution, assignee, whiteboard flags, keywords, patch count, priority, target milestone, version, QA contact, OS, Votes. Follow the related link below for a list of blog posts with more details on this." class="wp-image-326" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bugxhibit-cc-search-1024x723.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bugxhibit-cc-search-600x423.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bugxhibit-cc-search-300x211.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bugxhibit-cc-search.png 1346w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> The cool screenshot above is of a SIMILE Exhibit-based faceting UI I created for bugzilla a while back which may help provide a more immediate concept of how faceting works. See my exhibit blog tag for more in the space. Here are some example facets that search can soon support: Individual result paths: Categorize results by the path in which they happen. Do you not want to look at any results under devtools/? Push a button and filter out all those devtool results in an instant! Do you only care about layout/? Push a button and only see layout results! Subsystem facets: moz.build files labels every file in mozilla-central so that it has an associated Bugzilla Component. As of Bug 1783761 searchfox now also derives a subsystem mapping from the bugzilla components, which really just means that if you have a component that looks like “Core :: Storage: IndexedDB”, searchfox transforms that first colon into a slash so we get “Core/Storage/IndexedDB”. This would let you restrict your results to “Core/Storage” without having to manually select every Storage bugzilla component or path by hand. Symbol relationships: Did you search for a base class or virtual method which has a number of subclasses/overrides? Do you only care about some subset of the class hierarchy? Then restrict your results to whatever the portion of the set you care about. Recency of changes: Do you only care about seeing results whose blame history indicates it happened recently? Can do! Or maybe you only want to see code that hasn’t been touched in a long time? Uh, that might work less well until we improve the blame situation in Bug 1517978, but it’s always nice to have something to dream about. Code coverage: Only want to see results that runs a lot under our tests? Sure thing! Only want to see results that seem like we don’t have test coverage for? By looking at the result you’re now morally obligated to add test coverage! Key to this enhancement is that the faceting state will be reflected in the URL (likely the hash) so that you can share it or navigate forward and back and the state will be the same. It’s all too common on the web for state like this to be local to the page, but key to my searchfox vision is that URLs are key. If you do a lot of faceting, the URL may become large an unwieldy, but continuing in the style of :arai‘s fantastic work on Bug 1769936 and follow-ups to make it easy to get usable markdown out of searchfox, we can help wrap your URL in markdown link syntax so that when you paste it somewhere markdown-aware, it looks nice. Additional Query Constraints A bunch of those facets mentioned above sound like things that it would be neat to query on, right? Maybe even put them in a preset that you can share with others? Yes, we would add explicit query constraints for those as well, as well as to provide a way to convert faceted query results into a specific query that does not need to be faceted in Bug 1799805. A variety of other additional queries become possible as well: Searching for lines of text that are near each other, or not near each other, or maybe both inside the same argument list. Locating member fields by type (Bug 1733217), like if you wanted to find all member fields that are smart or raw pointer references to nsILoadInfo. Bug 1779340: Function/method argument list magic. Result Context Lines For All Result Types, Including Automatic Context <img decoding="async" width="827" height="471" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1.png" alt="" class="wp-image-987" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1.png 827w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1-300x171.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1-600x342.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1-768x437.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-1-500x285.png 500w" sizes="(max-width: 827px) 100vw, 827px" /> Current query results for C:4 AddOrPut A major limitation for searchfox searches has been a lack of support for context lines. (Disclaimer: in Bug 1414954 I added secret support for fulltext-only queries by prefixing a search with context:4 or similar, but you would then want to force a fulltext query like context:4 text:my actual search or context:4 re:my.*regexp[y]?.*search.) The query mechanism already supports full context, as the above screenshot is taken from the query for C:4 AddOrPut but note that the UX needs more passes and the gathering mechanism currently needs optimization which I have a WIP for in Bug 1794177 Diagrams <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="475" height="1024" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-475x1024.png" alt="A screenshot of the query `calls-between:'FrameLoader::loadInSameDocument' calls-between:'dispatchWindowEvent'` which is linked below." class="wp-image-992" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-475x1024.png 475w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-139x300.png 139w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-278x600.png 278w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-768x1655.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521-713x1536.png 713w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-233521.png 924w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 475px) 100vw, 475px" /> The above is a screenshot of a live diagram I just generated with the query calls-between:’WebCore::FrameLoader::loadInSameDocument’ calls-between:’WebCore::Document::dispatchWindowEvent’ against our searchfox index of webkit. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="856" height="1024" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109-856x1024.png" alt="screenshot of the graph resulting from the query `calls-between:'ClientSource::Focus' calls-between:'WindowClient_Binding::focus' depth:10`" class="wp-image-993" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109-856x1024.png 856w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109-251x300.png 251w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109-502x600.png 502w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109-768x918.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20221109-234109.png 1241w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 856px) 100vw, 856px" /> This next diagram is a screenshot of a live diagram from mozilla-central I just generated with the query <a href="https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/query/default?q=calls-between%3A%27mozilla%3A%3Adom%3A%3AClientSource%3A%3AFocus%27+calls-between%3A%27mozilla%3A%3Adom%3A%3AWindowClient_Binding%3A%3Afocus%27+depth%3A12" data-type="URL" data-id="https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/query/default?q=calls-between%3A%27ClientSource%3A%3AFocus%27+calls-between%3A%27WindowClient_Binding%3A%3Afocus%27+depth%3A10">calls-between:’mozilla::dom::ClientSource::Focus’ calls-between:’mozilla::dom::WindowClient_Binding::focus’ depth:12 and which demonstrates searchfox’s understanding of our IPDL bindings, as each of the SendP*/RecvP* pairs is capturing the IPC semantics that are only possible because of searchfox’s understanding of both C++ and IPDL. The next steps in diagramming will happen in Bug 1773165 with a focus on making the graphs interactive and applying heuristics related to graph clustering based on work on the “fancy branch” prototype and my recent work to derive the sub-component mapping for files that can in turn be propagated to classes/methods so that we can automatically collapse edges that cross sub-component boundaries (but which can be interactively expanded). This has involved a bit of yak-shaving on Bug 1776522 and Bug 1783761 and others. Note that we also support calls-to:'Identifier' in the query endpoint as well, but the graphs look a lot messier without the clustering heuristics, so I’m not including any in this post. Most of my work on searchfox is motivated by my desire to use diagrams in system understanding, with much of the other work being necessary because to make useful diagrams, you need to have useful and deep models of the underlying data. I’ll try and write more about this in the future, but this is definitely a case where: A picture is worth a thousand words and iterations on the diagrams are more useful than the relevant prose. Providing screen-reader accessible versions of the underlying data is fundamental. I have not yet ported the tree-dual version of the diagram logic from the “fancy” branch and I think this is a precondition to an initial release that’s more than just a proof-of-sorta-works. Documentation Integration Our in-tree docs rendered at https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/ are fantastic. Searchfox cannot replace human-authored documentation, but it can help you find them! Have you spent hours understanding code only to find that there was documentation that would help clarify what was going on only after the fact? Bug 1763532 will teach searchfox to index markdown so that documentation definitions and references show up in search and that we can potentially expose those in context menus. Subsequent steps could also index comment contents. Bug 1458882 will teach searchfox how to link to the rendered documentation. Improved Language Support New Language Support via SCIP With the advent of LSIF and SCIP and in particular the work by the team at sourcegraph to add language indexing built on existing analysis tools, there is now a tremendous amount of low hanging fruit in terms of off-the-shelf language indexing that searchfox can potentially ingest. Thanks to Emilio‘s initial work in Bug 1761287 we know that it’s reasonably straightforward to ingest SCIP data from these indexers. For each additional language we want to index, we expect the primary effort required will be to make the indexer available in a taskcluster task and appropriately configure it to index the potentially many component roots within the mozilla-central mono-repo. There will also be some searchfox-specific effort required to map the symbols into searchfox’s symbol namespace. Specific languages we can support (better): Javascript / Typescript via scip-typescript (Bug 1740290): scip-typescript potentially allows us to expose the same enhanced understanding of JS code, especially module-based JS code, that you experience in VS code, including type inference/extraction from JSDoc. Additionally, in Bug 1775130 we can leverage the amazing eslint work already done to bring enhanced analysis to more confusing situations like our mochitests which deal with more complex global situations. Overall, this can allow us to move away from searchfox’s current “soupy” understanding of JS code where it assumes that all the JS it ever sees is running in a single global. Python via scip-python (Bug 1426456) Java / Kotlin via scip-java (Bug 1490144) Improved C++ Support Searchfox’s strongest support is for C++ (and its interactions with XPIDL and IPDL), but there is still more to do here. Thankfully Botond is working to improve C++ template handling in Bug 1781178 and related bugs. Other enhancements: Bug 1419018: Allow distinguishing LHS/RHS usages of fields, with a prototype of relevance in Bug 1733217. Improved Mozilla-Specific Language Support mozilla-central contains a number of Mozilla-specific Interface Definition Languages (IDLs) and Domain Specific Languages (DSLs). Searchfox has existing support for: XPIDL .idl files: Our C++ support here is pretty good because XPIDL files are not preprocessed (beyond in-language support of #include and the ability to put pass-through C++ code including preprocessor directives inside %{C++ and %}demarcated blocks. Bug 1761689 tracks adding support for constants/enums which is not currently supported, and I have WIPs for this. Bug 1800008 tracks adding awareness of the rust bindings. IPDL .ipdl and .ipdlh files: Our C++ support here is good as long as the file is not pre-processed and the rust IPDL parser hasn’t fallen behind the Python parser. Unfortunately a lot of critical files like PContent.ipdl are pre-processed so this currently creates massive blind-spots in searchfox’s understanding of the system. Bug 1661067 will move us to having the Python parser/code generator emit data searchfox can ingest Searchfox has planned support for: WebIDL .webidl files: Bug 1416899 tracks indexing WebIDL files, and Bug 1525189 tracks the JS interaction side of this. StaticPrefList.yaml and related preference bindings: Bug 1699048 with discussion in Bug 1727789 on which it certainly depends. Taskcluster Taskgraph files: Bug 1800016. Pernosco Integration <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="716" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-1024x716.png" alt="A timeline visualization of data extracted from a pernosco session using pernosco-bridge. The specific data is showing IndexedDB database transaction lifetimes happening under the chrome origin with specific calls to AddOrPutRequestOp and CommitOp occurring." class="wp-image-988" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-1024x716.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-300x210.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-600x419.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-768x537.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-1536x1073.png 1536w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418-429x300.png 429w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210307-174418.png 1836w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> pernosco-bridge IDB timeline visualization Searchfox’s language indexing is inherently a form of static analysis. Consistent with the searchfox vision saying that “searchfox is not the only tool”, it makes sense to attempt to integrate with and build upon the tools that Firefox engineers are already using. Mozilla’s code-coverage data is already integrated with searchfox, and the next logical step is to integrate with pernosco, why not. I created pernosco-bridge as an experimental means of extracting data from pernosco and allowing for interactive visualizations. The screenshot above is an example of a timeline graph automatically extracted from a config file to show data relevant to IndexedDB. IndexedDB transactions were hierarchically related to their corresponding database and the origin that opened those databases. Within each transaction, ObjectStoreAddOrPutRequestOp and CommitOp operations are graphed. Clicking on the timeline would direct the pernosco tab to jump to those instants in time. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="245" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-1024x245.png" alt="A pernosco-bridge visualization of the sequence of events for DocumentLoadListener handling a redirect." class="wp-image-989" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-1024x245.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-300x72.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-600x143.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-768x184.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633-500x119.png 500w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210429-232633.png 1268w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> pernosco-bridge DocumentChannel visualization The above is a different visualization based on a config file for DocumentChannel to help group what’s going on in a pernosco trace and surface the relevant information. If you check out the config file, you will probably find it inscrutable, but with searchfox’s structured understanding of C++ classes landed last year in Bug 1641372 we can imagine leveraging searchfox’s understanding of the codebase to make this process friendly. More importantly, there is the potential to collaboratively build a shared knowledge base of what’s most relevant for classes, so everyone doesn’t need to re-do the same work. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="171" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-1024x171.png" alt="Object graph expressing parent relationships amongst windowGlobalParent and canonicalBrowsingContext, with URI values extracted for the canonicalBrowsingContext. More detail in the paragraph below." class="wp-image-990" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-1024x171.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-300x50.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-600x100.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-768x128.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-1536x256.png 1536w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-2048x342.png 2048w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20210510-200236-500x83.png 500w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Using the same information pernosco-bridge used to build the hierarchically organized timelines above with extracted values like URIs, it can also build graphs of the live objects at any moment in time in the trace. Above we can see the relationship between windowGlobalParent instances and their corresponding canonicalBrowsingContexts, plus the URIs of the canonicalBrowsingContexts. We can imagine using this to help visualize representative object graphs in searchfox. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="544" height="93" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/code-highlighted-header-sparkbar.png" alt="Old screenshot of pecobro source listing with a function `checkIfInRange` with a sparkline showing activity in a trace that is interleaved with source code lines" class="wp-image-97" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/code-highlighted-header-sparkbar.png 544w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/code-highlighted-header-sparkbar-300x51.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 544px) 100vw, 544px" /> We can also imagine doing something like the above screenshot from my prior experiment pecobro where we interleave graphs of function activity into source listings. Token-Centric Blame / “hyperannotate” Support via Microannotate <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="873" height="428" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image.png" alt="A screenshot of the microannotate output of https://clicky.visophyte.org/files/microannotate/nsWebBrowserPersist.cpp.html around the call to SaveURIInternal in nsWebBrowserPersist::SerializeNextFile that demonstrates blame tracking occurring on a per-token basis." class="wp-image-986" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image.png 873w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-300x147.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-600x294.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-768x377.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/image-500x245.png 500w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 873px) 100vw, 873px" /> A demonstration of microannotate’s output Quoting my dev-platform post about the unfortunate removal of searchfox’s first attempt at blame-skipping: “Revision history and the “annotate” / “blame” UIs for revision control are tricky because they’re built on a sequential, line-centric data-model where moving a function above another function in a file results in a destructive representational decision to treat one function as continuing through history and the other function as removed and then re-added as new code. Reformatting that maintains the overall sequence of tokens but changes how they are distributed across multiple lines also looks like removal of all of the old code and the addition of new code. Tools frequently perform heuristic-based post-passes to help identify intra-line changes which are reflected in diff UIs, as well as (entire) lines of code that are copied/moved in a revision (ex: Phabricator does this).” The plan to move forward is to move to a token-centric approach using :marco‘s microannotate project as tracked in Bug 1517978. We would also likely want to combine this with heuristics that skip over backout pairs. The screenshot at the top of this section is of example output for nsWebBrowserPersist.cpp where colors distinguish between different blame revision origins. Note that the addition of specific arguments can be seen as well as changes to comments. Source Listings Bug 1781179: Improved syntax and semantic highlighting in C++ for the tip/head indexed revision. Bug 1583635: Show expansion of C++ macros. Do you ever look at our XPCOM macrology and wish you weren’t about to spend several minutes clicking through those macros to understand what’s happening? This bug, my friend, this bug. Bug 1796870: Adopt use of tree-sitter as a tokenizer which can improve syntax highlighting for other languages as well as position: sticky context for both the tip/head indexed revision but also for historical revisions! Bug 1799557: Improved handling of links to source files that no longer exist by offering to show the last version of the file that existed or try and direct the user to the successor code. Bug 1697671: Link resource:// and chrome:// URLs in source listings to the underlying source files Test Info Boxes Bug 1785129: Add an info box mechanism to indicate the need for data collection review (“data review”) in info boxes on searchfox source listing pages Bug 1797855: Joel Maher and friends have been adding all kinds of great test metadata for searchfox to expose, and soon, this bug shall expose that information. Unfortunately there’s some yak shaving related to logging that remains underway. Bug 1797857: Extend the “Go to header file”/”Go to source file” mechanism to support WPT `.headers` files and xpcshell/mochitest `^headers^` files. Alternate Views of Data <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="415" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-1024x415.png" alt="screenshot of a table UI showing the field layout of nsIContent, mozilla::dom::FragmentOrElement, and mozilla::dom::Element across the 4 supported platforms (win64, macosx64, linux64, and android-armv7), showing field offsets and sizes." class="wp-image-994" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-1024x415.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-300x122.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-600x243.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-768x311.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-1536x622.png 1536w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-2048x830.png 2048w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20200331-021616-500x203.png 500w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Searchfox is able to provide more than source listings. The above screenshot shows searchfox’s understanding of the field layouts of C++ classes across all the platforms searchfox indexes on as rendered by the “fancy” branch prototype. Bug 1468445 tracks implementing a production quality version of this, noting that the data is already available, so this is straightforward. Bug 1799517 is a variation on this which would help us explicitly capture the destructor order of C++ fields. Bug 1672307 tracks showing the binary size impact of a given file, class, etc. Source Directory Listings In the recently landed Bug 1783761 I moved our directory listings into rust after shaving a whole bunch of yaks. Now we can do a bunch of queries on data about files. Would you like to see all the tests that are disabled in your components? We could do this! Would you like to see all the files in your components that have been modified in the last month but have bad coverage? We could also do that! There are many possibilities here but I haven’t filed bugs for them. Bug 1543707: Add README.md support to directories Mozilla Development Workflow Improvements Bug 1732585: Provide a way to search related (phabricator revision) review/bugzilla comments related to the current file Bug 1657786: Create searchfox taskcluster mode/variant that can run the C++ indexer only against changed files for try builds / phabricator requests Bug 1778802: Consider storing m-c analysis data in a git repo artifact with a bounded history via `git checkout –orphan` to enable try branch/code review features and recent semantic history support Easier Contributions The largest hurdle new contributors have faced is standing up a virtual machine. In Bug 1612525 we’ve added core support for docker, and we have additional work to do in that bug to document using docker and add additional support for using docker under WSL2 on Windows. Please feel free to drop by https://chat.mozilla.org/#/room/#searchfox:mozilla.org if you need help getting started. Deeper Integration with Mozilla Infrastructure Currently much of searchfox runs as EC2 jobs that exists outside of taskcluster, although C++ and rust indexing artifacts as well as all coverage data and test info data comes from taskcluster. Bug 1598502 tracks moving more of searchfox into taskcluster, although presumably the web-servers will still need to exist outside of taskcluster.
Searchfox (source, config source) is Mozilla’s primary code searching tool for Firefox introduced by Bill McCloskey in 2016 which built upon prior work on DXR. This product vision post describes my personal vision for searchfox and the rationale that underpins … Continue reading →
Searchfox (source, config source) is Mozilla’s primary code searching tool for Firefox introduced by Bill McCloskey in 2016 which built upon prior work on DXR. This product vision post describes my personal vision for searchfox and the rationale that underpins it. I’m also writing an accompanying road map that describes specific potential enhancements in support of this vision which I will publish soon and goes into the concrete potential features that would be implemented in the spirit of this vision. Note that the process of developing searchfox is iterative and done in consultation with its users and other contributors, primarily in the searchfox channel on chat.mozilla.org and in its bugzilla component. Accordingly, these documents should be viewed as a basis for discussion rather than a strict project plan. The Whys Of Searchfox Searchfox is a Tool For System Understanding Searchfox enables exploration and understanding of the Firefox codebase as it exists now, as it existed in the past, and to support understanding of the ramifications of potential changes. Searchfox Is A Tool For Shared System Understanding Firefox is a complex piece of software which has more going on than any one person can understand at a time. Searchfox enables Firefox’s contributors to leverage the documentation artifacts of other teams and contributors when exploring in isolation, and to communicate more effectively when interacting. Searchfox Is Not The Only Tool Searchfox integrates relevant data from automation and other tools in the Firefox development ecosystem where they make sense and provides deep links into those tools or first steps to help you get started without having to start from nothing. The Hows Of Searchfox Searchfox is Immediate: Low Latency and Complete Searchfox’s results should be available in their entirety when the page load completes, ideally in much less than a second. There should be no asynchronous lazy loading or spinners. Practically speaking, if you could potentially see something on a page, you should be able to ctrl-f for it. In situations where results are too voluminous to be practically useful, Searchfox should offer targeted follow-on searches that can relax limits and optionally provide for additional constraints so that iterative progress is made. Searchfox is Accessible Searchfox should always present a usable accessibility tree. This includes ensuring that any dynamically generated graphical representations such as graphviz-style diagrams have a directly usable accessibility tree or an alternate representation that maximally captures any hierarchy or clustering present in the visual presentation. Searchfox Favors Iterative Exploration and Low Activation Energy Searchfox seeks to avoid UX patterns where you have to metaphorically start from a blank sheet of paper or face decision paralysis choosing among a long list of options. Instead, start from whatever needle you have (an identifier name, a source file location, a string you saw in the UI) and searchfox will help you iterate and refine from there. Searchfox Provides Stable, Useful URLs When Possible and Markdown For More Complex Situations If you’re looking at something in searchfox, you should be able to share it as a URL, although there may be a few URLs to choose from such as whether to use a permalink which includes a specific revision identifier. More complicated situations may merit searchfox providing you with markdown that you can paste in tools that understand markdown.
Web Worker-assisted Email Visualizations using Vega
tl;dr: glodastrophe, the experimental entirely-client-side JS desktop-ish email app now supports Vega-based visualizations in addition to new support infrastructure for extension-y things and creating derived views based on the search/filter infrastructure. Two of the dreams of Mozilla Messaging were: Shareable … Continue reading →
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-917" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160321-034849-482x600.png" alt="Faceted and overview visualizations" width="482" height="600" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160321-034849-482x600.png 482w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160321-034849-241x300.png 241w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160321-034849.png 669w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 482px) 100vw, 482px" /> tl;dr: glodastrophe, the experimental entirely-client-side JS desktop-ish email app now supports Vega-based visualizations in addition to new support infrastructure for extension-y things and creating derived views based on the search/filter infrastructure. Two of the dreams of Mozilla Messaging were: Shareable email workflows (credit to :davida). If you could figure out how to set up your email client in a way that worked for you, you should be able to share that with others in a way that doesn’t require them to manually duplicate your efforts and ideally without you having to write code. (And ideally without anyone having to review code/anything in order to ensure there are no privacy or security problems in the workflow.) Useful email visualizations. While in the end, the only visualization ever shipped with Thunderbird was the simple timeline view of the faceted global search, various experiments happened along the way, some abandoned. For example, the following screenshot shows one of the earlier stages of faceted search development where each facet attempted to visualize the relative proportion of messages sharing that facet. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-918" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting-600x193.png" alt="faceted search UI prototype" width="600" height="193" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting-600x193.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting-300x96.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting-768x246.png 768w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting-1024x329.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-top-and-clicky-with-gpbugzilla-faceting.png 1474w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> At the time, the protovis JS visualization library was the state of the art. Its successor the amazing, continually evolving d3 has eclipsed it. d3, being a JS library, requires someone to write JS code. A visualization written directly in JS runs into the whole code review issue. What would be ideal is a means of specifying visualizations that is substantially more inert and easy to sandbox. Enter, Vega, a visualization grammar that can be expressed in JSON that can not only define “simple” static visualizations, but also mind-blowing gapminder-style interactive visualizations. Also, it has some very clever dataflow stuff under the hood and builds on d3 and its well-proven magic. I performed a fairly extensive survey of the current visualization, faceting, and data processing options to help bring visualizations and faceted filtered search to glodastrophe and other potential gaia mail consumers like the Firefox OS Gaia Mail App. Digression: Two relevant significant changes in how the gaia mail backend was designed compared to its predecessor Thunderbird (and its global database) are: As much as can possibly be done in a DOM/Web Worker(s) is done so. This greatly assists in UI responsiveness. Thunderbird has to do most things on the main thread because of hard-to-unwind implementation choices that permeate the codebase. It’s assumed that the local mail client may only have a subset of the messages known to the server, that the server may be smart, and that it’s possible to convince servers to support new functionality. In many ways, this is still aspirational (the backend has not yet implemented search on server), but the architecture has always kept this in mind. In terms of visualizations, what this means is that we pre-chew as much of the data in the worker as we can, drastically reducing both the amount of computation that needs to happen on the main (page) thread and the amount of data we have to send to it. It also means that we could potentially farm all of this out to the server if its search capabilities are sufficiently advanced. And/or the backend could cache previous results. For example, in the faceted visualizations on the sidebar (placed side-by-side here): <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-919" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-histograms.png" alt="faceted-histograms" width="444" height="350" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-histograms.png 444w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/faceted-histograms-300x236.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 444px) 100vw, 444px" /> In the “Prolific Authors” visualization definition, the backend in the worker constructs a Vega dataflow (only!). The search/filter mechanism is spun up and the visualization’s data gathering needs specify that we will load the messages that belong to each conversation in consideration. Then for each message we extract the author and age of the message and feed that to the dataflow graph. The data transforms bin the messages by date, facet the messages by author, and aggregate the message bins within each author. We then sort the authors by the number of messages they authored, and limit it to the top 5 authors which we then alphabetically sort. If we were doing this on the front-end, we’d have to send all N messages from the back-end. Instead, we send over just 5 histograms with a maximum of 60 data-points in each histogram, one per bin. Same deal with “Prolific domains”, but we extract the author’s mail domain and aggregate based on that. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-921" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/authored-content-size-overview-heatmap.png" alt="Authored content size overview heatmap" width="667" height="62" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/authored-content-size-overview-heatmap.png 667w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/authored-content-size-overview-heatmap-600x56.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/authored-content-size-overview-heatmap-300x28.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 667px) 100vw, 667px" /> Similarly, the overview Authored content size over time heatmap visualization sends only the aggregated heatmap bins over the wire, not all the messages. Elaborating, for each message body part, we (now) compute an estimate of the number of actual “fresh” content bytes in the message. Anything we can detect as a quote or a mailing list footer or multiple paragraphs of legal disclaimers doesn’t count. The x-axis bins by time; now is on the right, the oldest considered message is on the left. The y-axis bins by the log of the authored content size. Messages with zero new bytes are at the bottom, massive essays are at the top. The current visualization is useless, but I think the ingredients can and will be used to create something more informative. Other notable glodastrophe changes since the last blog post: Front-end state management is now done using redux The Material UI React library has been adopted for UI widget purposes, though the conversation and message summaries still need to be overhauled. React was upgraded A war was fought with flexbox and flexbox won. Hard-coding and calc() are the only reason the visualizations look reasonably sized. Webpack is now used for bundling in order to facilitate all of these upgrades and reduce potential contributor friction. More to come!
An email conversation summary visualization
We’ve been overhauling the Firefox OS Gaia Email app and its back-end to understand email conversations. I also created a react.js-based desktop-ish development UI, glodastrophe, that consumes the same back-end. My first attempt at summaries for glodastrophe was the following: … Continue reading →
We’ve been overhauling the Firefox OS Gaia Email app and its back-end to understand email conversations. I also created a react.js-based desktop-ish development UI, glodastrophe, that consumes the same back-end. My first attempt at summaries for glodastrophe was the following: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-910" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/old-summaries.png" alt="old summaries; 3 message tidbits" width="601" height="161" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/old-summaries.png 601w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/old-summaries-600x161.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/old-summaries-300x80.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 601px) 100vw, 601px" /> The back-end derives a conversation summary object from all of the messages that make up the conversation whenever any message in the conversation changes. While there are some things that are always computed (the number of messages in the conversation, whether there are any unread messages, any starred/flagged messages, etc.), the back-end also provides hooks for the front-end to provide application logic to do its own processing to meet its UI needs. In the case of this conversation summary, the application logic finds the first 3 unread messages in the conversation and stashes their date, author, and extracted snippet (if any) in a list of “tidbits”. This also is used to determine the height of the conversation summary in the conversation list. (The virtual list is aware of a quantized coordinate space where each conversation summary object is between 1 and 4 units high in this case.) While this is interesting because it’s something Thunderbird’s thread pane could not do, it’s not clear that the tidbits are an efficient use of screen real-estate. At least not when the number of unread messages in the conversation exceeds the 3 we cap the tidbits at. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-911" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/time-based-thread-vis-summary.png" alt="time-based thread summary visualization" width="527" height="81" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/time-based-thread-vis-summary.png 527w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/time-based-thread-vis-summary-300x46.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 527px) 100vw, 527px" /> But our app logic can actually do anything it wants. It could, say, establish the threading relationship of the messages in the conversation to enable us to make a highly dubious visualization of the thread structure in the conversation as well as show the activity in the conversation over time. Much like the visualization you already saw before you read this sentence. We can see the rhythm of the conversation. We can know whether this is a highly active conversation that’s still ongoing, or just that someone has brought back to life. Here’s the same visualization where we still use the d3 cluster layout but don’t clobber the x-position with our manual-quasi-logarithmic time-based scale: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-912" src="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/non-time-based-thread-vis-summary.png" alt="the visualization without time-based x-positioning" width="527" height="81" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/non-time-based-thread-vis-summary.png 527w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/non-time-based-thread-vis-summary-300x46.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 527px) 100vw, 527px" /> Disclaimer: This visualization is ridiculously impractical in cases where a conversation has only a small number of messages. But a neat thing is that the application logic could decide to use textual tidbits for small numbers of unread and a cool graph for larger numbers. The graph’s vertical height could even vary based on the number of messages in the conversation. Or the visualization could use thread-arcs if you like visualizations but want them based on actual research. If you’re interested in the moving pieces in the implementation, they’re here: The application logic that generates the summary objects. The support logic that normalizes it into a form for consumption by the front-end. The visualization logic in the front-end.
Talk Script: Firefox OS Email Performance Strategies
Last week I gave a talk at the Philly Tech Week 2015 Dev Day organized by the delightful people at technical.ly on some of the tricks/strategies we use in the Firefox OS Gaia Email app. Note that the credit for … Continue reading →
Last week I gave a talk at the Philly Tech Week 2015 Dev Day organized by the delightful people at technical.ly on some of the tricks/strategies we use in the Firefox OS Gaia Email app. Note that the credit for implementing most of these techniques goes to the owner of the Email app’s front-end, James Burke. Also, a special shout-out to Vivien for the initial DOM Worker patches for the email app. I tried to avoid having slides that both I would be reading aloud as the audience read silently, so instead of slides to share, I have the talk script. Well, I also have the slides here, but there’s not much to them. The headings below are the content of the slides, except for the one time I inline some code. Note that the live presentation must have differed slightly, because I’m sure I’m much more witty and clever in person than this script would make it seem… Cover Slide: Who! Hi, my name is Andrew Sutherland. I work at Mozilla on the Firefox OS Email Application. I’m here to share some strategies we used to make our HTML5 app Seem faster and sometimes actually Be faster. What’s A Firefox OS (Screenshot Slide) But first: What is a Firefox OS? It’s a multiprocess Firefox gecko engine on an android linux kernel where all the apps including the system UI are implemented using HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. All the apps use some combination of standard web APIs and APIs that we hope to standardize in some form. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-901" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-1-169x300.png" alt="Firefox OS homescreen screenshot" width="169" height="300" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-1-169x300.png 169w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-1.png 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 169px) 100vw, 169px" /> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-902" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-2-169x300.png" alt="Firefox OS clock app screenshot" width="169" height="300" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-2-169x300.png 169w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-2.png 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 169px) 100vw, 169px" /> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-903" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-3-169x300.png" alt="Firefox OS email app screenshot" width="169" height="300" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-3-169x300.png 169w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/screenshot-3.png 320w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 169px) 100vw, 169px" /> Here are some screenshots. We’ve got the default home screen app, the clock app, and of course, the email app. It’s an entirely client-side offline email application, supporting IMAP4, POP3, and ActiveSync. The goal, like all Firefox OS apps shipped with the phone, is to give native apps on other platforms a run for their money. And that begins with starting up fast. Fast Startup: The Problems But that’s frequently easier said than done. Slow-loading websites are still very much a thing. The good news for the email application is that a slow network isn’t one of its problems. It’s pre-loaded on the phone. And even if it wasn’t, because of the security implications of the TCP Web API and the difficulty of explaining this risk to users in a way they won’t just click through, any TCP-using app needs to be a cryptographically signed zip file approved by a marketplace. So we do load directly from flash. However, it’s not like flash on cellphones is equivalent to an infinitely fast, zero-latency network connection. And even if it was, in a naive app you’d still try and load all of your HTML, CSS, and JavaScript at the same time because the HTML file would reference them all. And that adds up. It adds up in the form of event loop activity and competition with other threads and processes. With the exception of Promises which get their own micro-task queue fast-lane, the web execution model is the same as all other UI event loops; events get scheduled and then executed in the same order they are scheduled. Loading data from an asynchronous API like IndexedDB means that your read result gets in line behind everything else that’s scheduled. And in the case of the bulk of shipped Firefox OS devices, we only have a single processor core so the thread and process contention do come into play. So we try not to be a naive. Seeming Fast at Startup: The HTML Cache If we’re going to optimize startup, it’s good to start with what the user sees. Once an account exists for the email app, at startup we display the default account’s inbox folder. What is the least amount of work that we can do to show that? Cache a screenshot of the Inbox. The problem with that, of course, is that a static screenshot is indistinguishable from an unresponsive application. So we did the next best thing, (which is) we cache the actual HTML we display. At startup we load a minimal HTML file, our concatenated CSS, and just enough Javascript to figure out if we should use the HTML cache and then actually use it if appropriate. It’s not always appropriate, like if our application is being triggered to display a compose UI or from a new mail notification that wants to show a specific message or a different folder. But this is a decision we can make synchronously so it doesn’t slow us down. Local Storage: Okay in small doses We implement this by storing the HTML in localStorage. Important Disclaimer! LocalStorage is a bad API. It’s a bad API because it’s synchronous. You can read any value stored in it at any time, without waiting for a callback. Which means if the data is not in memory the browser needs to block its event loop or spin a nested event loop until the data has been read from disk. Browsers avoid this now by trying to preload the Entire contents of local storage for your origin into memory as soon as they know your page is being loaded. And then they keep that information, ALL of it, in memory until your page is gone. So if you store a megabyte of data in local storage, that’s a megabyte of data that needs to be loaded in its entirety before you can use any of it, and that hangs around in scarce phone memory. To really make the point: do not use local storage, at least not directly. Use a library like localForage that will use IndexedDB when available, and then fails over to WebSQLDatabase and local storage in that order. Now, having sufficiently warned you of the terrible evils of local storage, I can say with a sorta-clear conscience… there are upsides in this very specific case. The synchronous nature of the API means that once we get our turn in the event loop we can act immediately. There’s no waiting around for an IndexedDB read result to gets its turn on the event loop. This matters because although the concept of loading is simple from a User Experience perspective, there’s no standard to back it up right now. Firefox OS’s UX desires are very straightforward. When you tap on an app, we zoom it in. Until the app is loaded we display the app’s icon in the center of the screen. Unfortunately the standards are still assuming that the content is right there in the HTML. This works well for document-based web pages or server-powered web apps where the contents of the page are baked in. They work less well for client-only web apps where the content lives in a database and has to be dynamically retrieved. The two events that exist are: “DOMContentLoaded” fires when the document has been fully parsed and all scripts not tagged as “async” have run. If there were stylesheets referenced prior to the script tags, the script tags will wait for the stylesheet loads. “load” fires when the document has been fully loaded; stylesheets, images, everything. But none of these have anything to do with the content in the page saying it’s actually done. This matters because these standards also say nothing about IndexedDB reads or the like. We tried to create a standards consensus around this, but it’s not there yet. So Firefox OS just uses the “load” event to decide an app or page has finished loading and it can stop showing your app icon. This largely avoids the dreaded “flash of unstyled content” problem, but it also means that your webpage or app needs to deal with this period of time by displaying a loading UI or just accepting a potentially awkward transient UI state. (Trivial HTML slide) DOMContentLoaded! This is the important summary of our index.html. We reference our stylesheet first. It includes all of our styles. We never dynamically load stylesheets because that compels a style recalculation for all nodes and potentially a reflow. We would have to have an awful lot of style declarations before considering that. Then we have our single script file. Because the stylesheet precedes the script, our script will not execute until the stylesheet has been loaded. Then our script runs and we synchronously insert our HTML from local storage. Then DOMContentLoaded can fire. At this point the layout engine has enough information to perform a style recalculation and determine what CSS-referenced image resources need to be loaded for buttons and icons, then those load, and then we’re good to be displayed as the “load” event can fire. After that, we’re displaying an interactive-ish HTML document. You can scroll, you can press on buttons and the :active state will apply. So things seem real. Being Fast: Lazy Loading and Optimized Layers But now we need to try and get some logic in place as quickly as possible that will actually cash the checks that real-looking HTML UI is writing. And the key to that is only loading what you need when you need it, and trying to get it to load as quickly as possible. There are many module loading and build optimizing tools out there, and most frameworks have a preferred or required way of handling this. We used the RequireJS family of Asynchronous Module Definition loaders, specifically the alameda loader and the r-dot-js optimizer. One of the niceties of the loader plugin model is that we are able to express resource dependencies as well as code dependencies. RequireJS Loader Plugins var fooModule = require('./foo'); var htmlString = require('text!./foo.html'); var localizedDomNode = require('tmpl!./foo.html'); The standard Common JS loader semantics used by node.js and io.js are the first one you see here. Load the module, return its exports. But RequireJS loader plugins also allow us to do things like the second line where the exclamation point indicates that the load should occur using a loader plugin, which is itself a module that conforms to the loader plugin contract. In this case it’s saying load the file foo.html as raw text and return it as a string. But, wait, there’s more! loader plugins can do more than that. The third example uses a loader that loads the HTML file using the ‘text’ plugin under the hood, creates an HTML document fragment, and pre-localizes it using our localization library. And this works un-optimized in a browser, no compilation step needed, but it can also be optimized. So when our optimizer runs, it bundles up the core modules we use, plus, the modules for our “message list” card that displays the inbox. And the message list card loads its HTML snippets using the template loader plugin. The r-dot-js optimizer then locates these dependencies and the loader plugins also have optimizer logic that results in the HTML strings being inlined in the resulting optimized file. So there’s just one single javascript file to load with no extra HTML file dependencies or other loads. We then also run the optimizer against our other important cards like the “compose” card and the “message reader” card. We don’t do this for all cards because it can be hard to carve up the module dependency graph for optimization without starting to run into cases of overlap where many optimized files redundantly include files loaded by other optimized files. Plus, we have another trick up our sleeve: Seeming Fast: Preloading Preloading. Our cards optionally know the other cards they can load. So once we display a card, we can kick off a preload of the cards that might potentially be displayed. For example, the message list card can trigger the compose card and the message reader card, so we can trigger a preload of both of those. But we don’t go overboard with preloading in the frontend because we still haven’t actually loaded the back-end that actually does all the emaily email stuff. The back-end is also chopped up into optimized layers along account type lines and online/offline needs, but the main optimized JS file still weighs in at something like 17 thousand lines of code with newlines retained. So once our UI logic is loaded, it’s time to kick-off loading the back-end. And in order to avoid impacting the responsiveness of the UI both while it loads and when we’re doing steady-state processing, we run it in a DOM Worker. Being Responsive: Workers and SharedWorkers DOM Workers are background JS threads that lack access to the page’s DOM, communicating with their owning page via message passing with postMessage. Normal workers are owned by a single page. SharedWorkers can be accessed via multiple pages from the same document origin. By doing this, we stay out of the way of the main thread. This is getting less important as browser engines support Asynchronous Panning & Zooming or “APZ” with hardware-accelerated composition, tile-based rendering, and all that good stuff. (Some might even call it magic.) When Firefox OS started, we didn’t have APZ, so any main-thread logic had the serious potential to result in janky scrolling and the impossibility of rendering at 60 frames per second. It’s a lot easier to get 60 frames-per-second now, but even asynchronous pan and zoom potentially has to wait on dispatching an event to the main thread to figure out if the user’s tap is going to be consumed by app logic and preventDefault called on it. APZ does this because it needs to know whether it should start scrolling or not. And speaking of 60 frames-per-second… Being Fast: Virtual List Widgets …the heart of a mail application is the message list. The expected UX is to be able to fling your way through the entire list of what the email app knows about and see the messages there, just like you would on a native app. This is admittedly one of the areas where native apps have it easier. There are usually list widgets that explicitly have a contract that says they request data on an as-needed basis. They potentially even include data bindings so you can just point them at a data-store. But HTML doesn’t yet have a concept of instantiate-on-demand for the DOM, although it’s being discussed by Firefox layout engine developers. For app purposes, the DOM is a scene graph. An extremely capable scene graph that can handle huge documents, but there are footguns and it’s arguably better to err on the side of fewer DOM nodes. So what the email app does is we create a scroll-region div and explicitly size it based on the number of messages in the mail folder we’re displaying. We create and render enough message summary nodes to cover the current screen, 3 screens worth of messages in the direction we’re scrolling, and then we also retain up to 3 screens worth in the direction we scrolled from. We also pre-fetch 2 more screens worth of messages from the database. These constants were arrived at experimentally on prototype devices. We listen to “scroll” events and issue database requests and move DOM nodes around and update them as the user scrolls. For any potentially jarring or expensive transitions such as coordinate space changes from new messages being added above the current scroll position, we wait for scrolling to stop. Nodes are absolutely positioned within the scroll area using their ‘top’ style but translation transforms also work. We remove nodes from the DOM, then update their position and their state before re-appending them. We do this because the browser APZ logic tries to be clever and figure out how to create an efficient series of layers so that it can pre-paint as much of the DOM as possible in graphic buffers, AKA layers, that can be efficiently composited by the GPU. Its goal is that when the user is scrolling, or something is being animated, that it can just move the layers around the screen or adjust their opacity or other transforms without having to ask the layout engine to re-render portions of the DOM. When our message elements are added to the DOM with an already-initialized absolute position, the APZ logic lumps them together as something it can paint in a single layer along with the other elements in the scrolling region. But if we start moving them around while they’re still in the DOM, the layerization logic decides that they might want to independently move around more in the future and so each message item ends up in its own layer. This slows things down. But by removing them and re-adding them it sees them as new with static positions and decides that it can lump them all together in a single layer. Really, we could just create new DOM nodes, but we produce slightly less garbage this way and in the event there’s a bug, it’s nicer to mess up with 30 DOM nodes displayed incorrectly rather than 3 million. But as neat as the layerization stuff is to know about on its own, I really mention it to underscore 2 suggestions: 1, Use a library when possible. Getting on and staying on APZ fast-paths is not trivial, especially across browser engines. So it’s a very good idea to use a library rather than rolling your own. 2, Use developer tools. APZ is tricky to reason about and even the developers who write the Async pan & zoom logic can be surprised by what happens in complex real-world situations. And there ARE developer tools available that help you avoid needing to reason about this. Firefox OS has easy on-device developer tools that can help diagnose what’s going on or at least help tell you whether you’re making things faster or slower: – it’s got a frames-per-second overlay; you do need to scroll like mad to get the system to want to render 60 frames-per-second, but it makes it clear what the net result is – it has paint flashing that overlays random colors every time it paints the DOM into a layer. If the screen is flashing like a discotheque or has a lot of smeared rainbows, you know something’s wrong because the APZ logic is not able to to just reuse its layers. – devtools can enable drawing cool colored borders around the layers APZ has created so you can see if layerization is doing something crazy There’s also fancier and more complicated tools in Firefox and other browsers like Google Chrome to let you see what got painted, what the layer tree looks like, et cetera. And that’s my spiel. Links The source code to Gaia can be found at https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia The email app in particular can be found at https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/tree/master/apps/email (I also asked for questions here.)
webpd: a Polymer-based web UI for the beets music library manager
beets is the extensible music database tool every programmer with a music collection has dreamed of writing. At its simplest it’s a clever tagger that can normalize your music against the MusicBrainz database and then store the results in a … Continue reading →
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-878" alt="beets webpd filtered artists list" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-filtered-artists.png" width="863" height="713" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-filtered-artists.png 863w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-filtered-artists-600x495.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-filtered-artists-300x247.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 863px) 100vw, 863px" /> beets is the extensible music database tool every programmer with a music collection has dreamed of writing. At its simplest it’s a clever tagger that can normalize your music against the MusicBrainz database and then store the results in a searchable SQLite database. But with plugins it can fetch album art, use the Discogs music database for tagging too, calculate ReplayGain values for all your music, integrate meta-data from The Echo Nest, etc. It even has a Music Player Daemon server-mode (bpd) and a simple HTML interface (web) that lets you search for tracks and play them in your browse using the HTML5 audio tag. I’ve tried a lot of music players through the years (alphabetically: amarok, banshee, exaile, quodlibet, rhythmbox). They all are great music players and (at least!) satisfy the traditional Artist/Album/Track hierarchy use-case, but when you exceed 20,000 tracks and you have a lot of compilation cd’s, that frequently ends up not being enough. Extending them usually turned out to be too hard / not fun enough, although sometimes it was just a question of time and seeking greener pastures. But enough context; if you’re reading my blog you probably are on board with the web platform being the greatest platform ever. The notable bits of the implementation are: Server-wise, it’s a mash-up of beets’ MPD-alike plugin bpd and its web plugin. Rather than needing to speak the MPD protocol over TCP to get your server to play music, you can just hit it with an HTTP POST and it will enqueue and play the song. Server-sent events/EventSource are used to let the web UI hypothetically update as things happen on the server. Right now the client can indeed tell the server to play a song and hear an update via the EventSource channel, but there’s almost certainly a resource leak on the server-side and there’s a lot more web/bpd interlinking required to get it reliable. (Python’s Flask is neat, but I’m not yet clear on how to properly manage the life-cycle of a long-lived request that only dies when the connection dies since I’m seeing the appcontext get torn down even before the generator starts running.) The client is implemented in Polymer on top of some simple backbone.js collections that build on the existing logic from the beets web plugin. The artist list uses the polymer-virtual-list element which is important if you’re going to be scrolling through a ton of artists. The implementation is page-based; you tell it how many pages you want and how many items are on each page. As you scroll it fires events that compel you to generate the appropriate page. It’s an interesting implementation: Pages are allowed to be variable height and therefore their contents are too, although a fixedHeight mode is also supported. In variable-height mode, scroll offsets are translated to page positions by guessing the page based on the height of the first page and then walking up/down from there based on cached page-sizes until the right page size is found. If there is missing information because the user managed to trigger a huge jump, extrapolation is performed based on the average item size from the first page. Any changes to the contents of the list regrettably require discarding all existing pages/bindings. At this time there is no way to indicate a splice at a certain point that should simply result in a displacement of the existing items. Albums are loaded in batches from the server and artists dynamically derived from them. Although this would allow for the UI to update as things are retrieved, the virtual-list invalidation issue concerned me enough to have the artist-list defer initialization until all albums are loaded. On my machine a couple thousand albums load pretty quickly, so this isn’t a huge deal. There’s filtering by artist name and number of albums in the database by that artist built on backbone-filtered-collection. The latter one is important to me because scrolling through hundreds of artists where I might only own one cd or not even one whole cd is annoying. (Although the latter is somewhat addressed currently by only using the albumartist for the artist generation so various artists compilations don’t clutter things up.) If you click on an artist it plays the first track (numerically) from the first album (alphabetically) associated with the artist. This does limit the songs you can listen to somewhat… visualizations are done using d3.js; one svg per visualization <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-880" alt="beets webpd madonna and morrissey" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-madonna-morissey-smooshified.png" width="709" height="81" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-madonna-morissey-smooshified.png 709w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-madonna-morissey-smooshified-600x68.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/beets-webpd-madonna-morissey-smooshified-300x34.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 709px) 100vw, 709px" /> “What’s with all those tastefully chosen colors?” is what you are probably asking yourself. The answer? Two things! A visualization of albums/releases in the database by time, heat-map style. We bin all of the albums that beets knows about by year. In this case we assume that 1980 is the first interesting year and so put 1979 and everything before it (including albums without a year) in the very first bin on the left. The current year is the rightmost bucket. We vertically divide the albums into “albums” (red), “singles” (green), and “compilations” (blue). This is accomplished by taking the MusicBrainz Release Group / Types and mapping them down to our smaller space. The more albums in a bin, the stronger the color. A scatter-plot using the echo nest‘s acoustic attributes for the tracks where: the x-axis is “danceability”. Things to the left are less danceable. Things to the right are more danceable. the y-axis is “valence” which they define as “the musical positiveness conveyed by a track”. Things near the top are sadder, things near the bottom are happier. the colors are based on the type of album the track is from. The idea was that singles tend to have remixes on them, so it’s interesting if we always see a big cluster of green remixes to the right. tracks without the relevant data all end up in the upper-left corner. There are a lot of these. The echo nest is extremely generous in allowing non-commercial use of their API, but they limit you to 20 requests per minute and at this point the beets echonest plugin needs to upload (transcoded) versions of all my tracks since my music collection is apparently more esoteric than what the servers already have fingerprints for. Together these visualizations let us infer: Madonna is more dancey than Morrissey! Shocking, right? I bought the Morrissey singles box sets. And I got ripped off because there’s a distinct lack of green dots over on the right side. Code is currently in the webpd branch of my beets fork although I should probably try and split it out into a separate repo. You need to enable the webpd plugin like you would any other plugin for it to work. There’s still a lot lot lot more work to be done for it to be usable, but I think it’s neat already. It definitely works in Firefox and Chrome.
monitoring gaia travis build status using webmail LED notifiers
For Firefox OS the Gaia UI currently uses Travis CI to run a series of test jobs in parallel for each pull request. While Travis has a neat ember.js-based live-updating web UI, I usually find myself either staring at my … Continue reading →
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-862" alt="usb LED webmail notifiers showing build status" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/gaudy-leds-build-colors.jpg" width="600" height="209" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/gaudy-leds-build-colors.jpg 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/gaudy-leds-build-colors-300x104.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> For Firefox OS the Gaia UI currently uses Travis CI to run a series of test jobs in parallel for each pull request. While Travis has a neat ember.js-based live-updating web UI, I usually find myself either staring at my build watching it go nowhere or forgetting about it entirely. The latter is usually what ends up happening since we have a finite number of builders available, we have tons of developers, each build takes 5 jobs, and some of those jobs can take up to 35 minutes to run when they finally get a turn to run. I recently noticed ThinkGeek had a bunch of Dream Cheeky USB LED notifiers on sale. They’re each a USB-controlled tri-color LED in a plastic case that acts as a nice diffuser. Linux’s “usbled” driver exposes separate red/green/blue files via sysfs that you can echo numbers into to control them. While the driver and USB protocol inherently support a range of 0-255, it seems like 0-63 or 0-64 is all they give. The color gamut isn’t amazing but is quite respectable and they are bright enough that they are useful in daylight. I made a node.js library at https://github.com/asutherland/gaudy-leds that can do some basic tricks and is available on npm as “gaudy-leds”. You can tell it to do things by doing “gaudy-leds set red green blue purple”, etc. I added a bunch of commander sub-commands, so “gaudy-leds –help” should give a lot more details than the currently spartan readme. I couldn’t find any existing tools/libraries to easily watch a Travis CI build and invoke commands like that (though I feel like they must exist) so I wrote https://github.com/asutherland/travis-build-watcher. While the eventual goal is to not have to manually activate it at all, right now I can point it at a Travis build or a github pull request and it will poll appropriately so it ends up at the latest build and updates the state of the LEDs each time it polls. Relevant notes / context: There is a storied history of people hooking build/tree status up to LED lights and real traffic lights and stuff like that. I think if you use Jenkins you’re particularly in luck. This isn’t anything particularly new or novel, but the webmail notifiers are a great off-the-shelf solution. The last time I did something like this I used a phidgets LED64 in a rice paper lamp and the soldering was much more annoying than dealing with a mess of USB cables. Also, it could really only display one status at a time. There are obviously USB port scalability issues, but you can get a 24-port USB hub for ~$40 from Amazon/monoprice/etc. (They all seem to be made by the same manufacturer.) I coincidentally bought 24 of the notifiers after my initial success with 6, so I am really prepared for an explosion in test jobs! While I’m currently trying to keep things UNIXy with a bunch of small command-line tools operating together, I think I would like to have some kind of simple message-bus mechanism so that: mozilla-central mach builds can report status as they go webhooks / other async mechanisms can be used to improve efficiency and require less manual triggering/interaction on my end. So if I re-spin a build from the web UI I won’t need to re-trigger the script locally and such. Please let me know if you’re aware of existing solutions in this space, I didn’t find much and am planning to just use redis as glue for a bunch of small/independent pieces plus a more daemonish node process for polling / interacting with the web/AMQP. There are efforts underway to overhaul the continuous integration mechanism used for Gaia. This should address delays in starting tests by being able to throw more resources at them as well as allow notification by whatever Mozilla Pulse’s successor is.
about:nosy can now show CPU usage using jsprobes
Refresher: about:nosy was introduced one week ago as a way to see the memory usage of your tabs and extensions (that live in compartments). It sorta looked like this: Except those (green) bars on the right are new. The ones … Continue reading →
Refresher: about:nosy was introduced one week ago as a way to see the memory usage of your tabs and extensions (that live in compartments). It sorta looked like this: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-845" title="about:nosy with nothing expanded" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-overview-scaled.png" alt="" width="596" height="432" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-overview-scaled.png 596w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-overview-scaled-300x217.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 596px) 100vw, 596px" /> Except those (green) bars on the right are new. The ones on the left, they show memory. The ones on the right, they show CPU usage. New data points enter on the left, surf across to the right, then fall into oblivion. I have it on good authority that researchers are looking into some way of labeling these things so that you don’t have to read a blog post to understand them. But until they do, I have a blogging gig, so let’s hope it takes them a bit longer. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-846" title="about:nosy memory and cpu usage for devmo weather demo" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-devmo-weather-cpu.png" alt="" width="552" height="46" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-devmo-weather-cpu.png 552w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-devmo-weather-cpu-300x25.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 552px) 100vw, 552px" /> The above is a picture of the bars belonging to a tab viewing a Mozilla Demo Studio demo by ybochatay https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/demos/detail/animation-of-weather-fronts/launch. What’s really neat about this example is that you can see it was going to town on the CPU in the past (right; past), then usage fell off a cliff. Why? Because I changed from that tab to the about:nosy tab. I’m going to assume that’s Firefox’s setTimeout/setInterval throttling of background tabs was at work and the team is to be congratulated for that. If it’s the case that the demo or the demo framework is very responsible, kudos to those involved parties. We track CPU utilization on a per-compartment basis, taking care to only attribute usage to a single compartment per thread at a time. In the event of ill-behaved parties spinning a nested event loop, we are not currently clever enough to stop the clock in this implementation. Native code costs like reflows that are incurred with the JS still on the stack will happily be attributed to the compartment. The magic that powers the CPU tracking is Brian Burg‘s jsprobes implementation. See his blog post and master probe hacker (ETW!) Steve Fink‘s blog post on its magical powers. If you are adventurous… …you can build your own Firefox build with jsprobes. The patch series to use is my updated fork found here on bitbucket. You’ll want to build with “ac_add_options –enable-jsprobes”. The one non-jsprobes change in there is to cause all XPConnect memory reporters to provide the address of their compartment just like system compartments do. Doing so allows us to correlate compartment CPU usage to the compartment’s memory reporter information without going crazy. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-847" title="about:gc timeline graph" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-timeline.png" alt="" width="546" height="364" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-timeline.png 546w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-timeline-300x200.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 546px) 100vw, 546px" /> You can verify things work by trying out about:jsprobes, a simple extension you can hack on to play with probes. You can also check out the Steve Fink created/Brian Burg jsprobes-enabled* about:gc implementation which provides us with the screenshots in the immediate vicinity of this sentence. I’m not sure what those squiggly things on the left and the bottom of the boxes filled with pretty lines and dots are; I’ll see if I can find a blog post explaining them. Or you can grab the source for about:nosy. * I think this is the attribution breakdown based on my own inference; I could be wrong. Either way, they’re both awesome. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-848" title="aboutgc-pause-reclamation" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-pause-reclamation.png" alt="" width="540" height="366" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-pause-reclamation.png 540w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/aboutgc-pause-reclamation-300x203.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px" /> If you are not adventurous… …I will hopefully spin some try builds in the near future. Wait for those. Right now about:nosy still has unacceptable levels of performance impact on your session once you get a bunch of tabs so the custom builds would be one-off novelty uses for 30 seconds. But while you wait, maybe you would like to peruse the probes that power the CPU monitoring? In closing? It’s worth noting that there are other viable ways to track compartment CPU usage, but jsprobes are the funnest.
about:nosy is about:memory with charts, helps you lay blame more easily
about:memory and the memory reporter infrastructure that powers it are amazing. They provide an explicit hierarchy that breaks down the memory use in the system to the subsystems and increasingly the causes of allocation. about:memory looks like this (if you … Continue reading →
about:memory and the memory reporter infrastructure that powers it are amazing. They provide an explicit hierarchy that breaks down the memory use in the system to the subsystems and increasingly the causes of allocation. about:memory looks like this (if you stand a few feet back from your monitor and take off your glasses): <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-829" title="Example (non-verbose) about:memory session" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-memory-example-225x300.png" alt="" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-memory-example-225x300.png 225w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-memory-example-450x600.png 450w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-memory-example.png 695w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /> If you are going to look at about:memory, it is probably for one of two reasons: You are Nicholas Nethercote or one of his merry band of MemShrink hackers kicking ass and taking names (of inefficient uses of memory). In this case, about:memory is exactly what you need. You suspect some tab in Firefox has gone crazy and you want to figure out which one it is and take your vengeance upon it. Vengeance can take the form of thinking mean thoughts, closing the tab, or writing a snarky tweet. about:memory will let you do this, but you have to look at a lot of text and you may already be too late to find the culprit! If only there was an easier way… Enter about:nosy: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-832" title="about:nosy showing three tabs open from cnn.com" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-tabs-cnn-600x104.png" alt="" width="600" height="104" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-tabs-cnn-600x104.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-tabs-cnn-300x52.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-tabs-cnn.png 810w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> It can show us a list of all the open tabs and their memory usage sans JS for now, as per the above screenshot. If you expand the tab capsules, you get to see the list of all the inner windows/iframes that live in the hierarchy of that page. In most cases the list is either really short and boring or really long and boring. In the case of www.cnn.com I end up with 26 inner windows. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-833" title="about:nosy expanded origin capsule for www.cnn.com" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-origin-cnn-600x193.png" alt="" width="600" height="193" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-origin-cnn-600x193.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-origin-cnn-300x96.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-origin-cnn.png 823w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> It can also show us memory aggregated by origin. We do show JS for this case because JS is currently only trackable on a per-origin basis. When Bug 650353 gets fixed or the memory reporters get more specific we should be able to apportion JS usage to pages directly. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-834" title="about:nosy extensions display" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-exts-600x123.png" alt="" width="600" height="123" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-exts-600x123.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-exts-300x61.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/about-nosy-exts.png 830w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> It also attempts to aggregate extension JS compartments back to their owning extension. We ask the add-on manager for a list of the installed extensions to find their filesystem roots, ask the resource protocol to explain resource mappings, and from there are able to translate such paths. Just keep in mind that traditional overlay-based extensions do not create their own compartments and so are invisible for tracking purposes. In the screenshot above, you can see that about:nosy keeps the charts exciting by generating a ridiculous amount of garbage all by itself. Much of this is just the about:memory tree-building code that we are reusing. If you refreshed about:memory once a second you would probably see similar garbage creation from the main system JS compartment. You can install a restartless XPI (update: points at 0.3 now which does not screw up style shell apportionment and uses a better add-on SDK that does not create throwaway JS compartments every second) of the state of the now that will not auto-update. It wants a recent nightly build of Firefox because it makes assumptions about the structure of the memory reporters in order to better serve you. You can find the source repo on github. It requires the add-on SDK to build. It might seem a little overkill for just graphing memory history, but if you’re looking at the repo you will notice my goal is to use Brian Burg‘s jsprobes work aided by Steve Fink and now de-bitrotted by me (but still a bit crashy) to be able to graph CPU usage, including raw JS, layout/reflow, and paint (eventually, after adding probe points). It’s also possible for those statistics to be gathered via static mechanisms, but the probes are fun and I want to see them work.
The joy of integrated logging and log viewing with fancy logs
The deuxdrop messaging experiment‘s current incarnation exists as an (under development) Jetpack that runs in Firefox. I am still trying to shake out functionality to be driven by the UI rather than headless unit tests. While firebug has been a … Continue reading →
The deuxdrop messaging experiment‘s current incarnation exists as an (under development) Jetpack that runs in Firefox. I am still trying to shake out functionality to be driven by the UI rather than headless unit tests. While firebug has been a great help, another boon has been the logging framework and log viewing framework developed for the unit tests. (Previous posts here and here). Since the log is made up of structured JSON data, all the log processing logic is written in JS, and the log viewing UI is HTML/CSS/JS, it is trivial to embed the log viewer into the Jetpack itself. If you type about:loggest in the URL bar (or better yet, create a bookmark on the bookmark bar and click that), the log viewer is displayed. Deuxdrop’s client daemon logic (which runs in a hidden frame), uses a log reaper that runs at 1-second intervals. If anything happens log-wise during that second, it is packaged and added to a circular-buffer style list of the last 60 seconds where anything happened. When the log viewer starts up, it asks for and receives the data. The result looks like the above small screenshot. If no errors were logged during the time interval, it is automatically collapsed. Let us experience the joy of integrated logging by looking at a real problem I recently encountered. In the development UI (accessible via about:dddev), I brought up a list of my contacts after starting a conversation. It looks like this right now: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-811" title="peeps-tab-user-erroneously-included" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/peeps-tab-user-erroneously-included.png" alt="" width="505" height="91" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/peeps-tab-user-erroneously-included.png 505w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/peeps-tab-user-erroneously-included-300x54.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px" /> The problem is that I, the user, am “Andrew Sutherland” and should not be in my own contact list. Also, the display should not be claiming there are an undefined number of unread messages from me, but that is likely fallout from the system intentionally not maintaining such information about me, the user. I want to quickly figure out why this is happening, so I bring up about:loggest and open the most recent time entry to see what happened when this query was issued and filled: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-814" title="loggest-query-peeps-by-any" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-query-peeps-by-any-600x139.png" alt="" width="600" height="139" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-query-peeps-by-any-600x139.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-query-peeps-by-any-300x69.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-query-peeps-by-any.png 1014w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> I can see that the query ended up issuing database requests for both Walternate (purple) and myself (green), strongly suggesting that the database index being queried on names me. I wonder if the conversation processing logic was the code that did this… let’s check by going to the time slice where the conversation was processed, expanding it, and only screenshotting some of it: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-813" title="loggest-new-conv-join-process-bad-index-write" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-new-conv-join-process-bad-index-write.png" alt="" width="594" height="461" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-new-conv-join-process-bad-index-write.png 594w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/loggest-new-conv-join-process-bad-index-write-300x232.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 594px) 100vw, 594px" /> Yes, the conversation logic did this. It’s generating index values in the peepData table for the idxPeepAny and idxPeepRecip indices. But I thought my unit tests covered this? Nope. It turns that although we test that a peep query returns the right thing both cold from the database and inductively via notifications as contact relationships are established, we don’t issue a new query after creating a conversation. Furthermore, we only issued queries against the alphabetical index, not against idxPeepAny. So we rectify that by augmenting the unit test: // - make sure that the conversation addition did not screw up our peeps list T.group('check peeps list after conversation join'); lqFinalAllPeeps = moda_a.do_queryPeeps("allPeepsFinal:any", {by: 'any'}); And the test indeed now fails: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-815" title="test-run-details-query-any-failure" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-600x155.png" alt="" width="600" height="155" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-600x155.png 600w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-300x77.png 300w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-1024x266.png 1024w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure.png 1158w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /> The relevant bit is in the lower right, which I blow up here with the “unexpected event” obj popup displayed above it, and the “failed expectation” obj popup below it. The postAnno stuff is to indicate what is new in the query result. Because it’s a freshly issued query and this is the first set of results, everything is new. It’s probably worth noting that these errors would usually show up as a single “mismatched” error instead of an unexpected/failed pair in our tests, but the specific logger was operating in unordered set mode because we don’t care about the exact order that different query notifications occur in, we just care that they do occur. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-816" title="test-run-details-query-any-failure-focused-with-popups" src="http://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-focused-with-popups.png" alt="" width="534" height="355" srcset="https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-focused-with-popups.png 534w, https://www.visophyte.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/test-run-details-query-any-failure-focused-with-popups-300x199.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 534px) 100vw, 534px" /> (The structure is intended to later be enhanced to provide a nicer visualization where we only show the contents of the “state” attribute and use preAnno to indicate annotations on a representation of the most recent state for the object (from a previous log entry) and postAnno to indicate annotations on the now-current representation “state”. For postAnno, values of 1 represent an addition, and values of 0 represent a change or event firing on the object.) A potentially even more exciting bit of integrated logging is that about:loggest-server opens a tab that retrieves its contents from the server. When run with the –loggest-web-debug flag, the server loads a module that cranks up the logging and does the same 1-second interval log reaping magic and exposes it for HTTP retrieval. While this specific configuration with the high level of detailed logging is only appropriate for a developer-machine test server, it is incredibly valuable to be able to just pop open another tab and see what the server just got up to. In any event, I leave it as an exercise to the reader to assume that I will take care of the bug now that it’s extremely clear what the problem is. Well, extremely clear if I had taken a bigger screenshot of the conversation creation log. Above the region captured is a header that indicates the actions are being triggered by the ‘convJoin’ task and the entry (which is visible) indicates the update_conv_data function likely kicked off the database activity. PS: All the gibberish looking characters in the screenshots are crypto keys or other binary data that lack aliases mapping them to known objects. Examples of successfully mapped aliases are the colored blocks. In the case of the conversation creation gibberish, we are seeing the conversation id. Those aliases are generated as a separate pass by the log reaper by walking the set of existing queries and using helper functions to map the items currently exposed by the queries to human names because it’s quick and easy and is O(what’s being looked at) not O(size of the database). In the case of the conversation, there was no query against the conversation and I also have not written the helper function yet, which is why it did not get aliased. Unit tests don’t have the problem because we create aliases for everything.