Comments on: Pretty Polish http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2007/10/20/pretty-polish/ Andrew Sutherland writes things but (almost) always includes pictures to look at. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:12:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Vincent http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2007/10/20/pretty-polish/comment-page-1/#comment-383 Vincent Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:44:18 +0000 http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2007/10/20/pretty-polish/#comment-383 Eyecandy+1 Looking good. Congrats! Regarding speed though, I don't have reference basis since we're looking at pngs here (unless they're generated on the fly?). I'm not sure what the best way to convey/define such a performance metric is, although I know convolution is typically one of the more expensive operations. Eyecandy+1

Looking good. Congrats!

Regarding speed though, I don’t have reference basis since we’re looking at pngs here (unless they’re generated on the fly?). I’m not sure what the best way to convey/define such a performance metric is, although I know convolution is typically one of the more expensive operations.

]]> By: Cindi Parkinson http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2007/10/20/pretty-polish/comment-page-1/#comment-380 Cindi Parkinson Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:02:06 +0000 http://www.visophyte.org/blog/2007/10/20/pretty-polish/#comment-380 This is beautiful! This is beautiful!

]]>